Waterfront buyer guidesYacht.house

Report template · Version 1.1

Marine access verification report template

See what a vessel-specific marine access review should document: the property connection, reviewed destination, depth across a usable passage corridor, vertical clearance and any tidal access window.

This is a blank template, not an issued report or a finding of compatibility. Bracketed entries require evidence and reviewer completion. The internal implementation appendix is not part of this public preview.

Report overview
Report overview fields 1
Property[Street Address], [City, State ZIP]
Vessel[Vessel Name / Make / Model]
Report IDYH-[REGION]-[NUMBER]
Report Version1.1
Review Date[Date]
Data Current Through[Date]

VERIFIED MARINE ACCESS RESULT

[COMPATIBLE / CONDITIONAL / NOT COMPATIBLE / UNABLE TO VERIFY]

Overall Verification Confidence: [HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]

Determination: For the vessel and operating conditions specified, the reviewed route from [property access point and waterbody] to [named destination and type: ocean / gulf / bay / lagoon / estuary / other] is [COMPATIBLE / CONDITIONAL / NOT COMPATIBLE / UNABLE TO VERIFY]. State the permitted water-level range, passage-width requirements and material limitations. Access to protected open water does not establish ocean access.

Vessel analyzed

Report overview fields 7
DimensionValue
Length overall[XX.X ft]
Beam[XX.X ft]
Draft[X.X ft]
Vessel height above water[XX.X ft in transit configuration]

Marine access summary

Report overview fields 9
MetricResult
Distance to named destination[X.XX NM]
Controlling depth across required passage width[X.X ft]
Under-keel margin at assessed water level[+X.X ft]
Available vertical clearance[XX.X ft]
Overhead margin at assessed water level[+X.X ft]
Fixed bridges identified[X]
Movable bridges identified[X]
Route confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
Property-access confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
Destination type[Ocean / gulf / protected bay / lagoon / estuary / other]
Tidal access status[Across assessed range / tide-dependent / not compatible / unverified]
Usable width at required depth[XX.X ft / unverified]

Reviewed by: [Reviewer Name / Yacht.house Marine Access Verification] Issued by: Yacht House, Inc.

2. Reviewed Marine Route

Property to the named destination

[INSERT LARGE ROUTE MAP / IMAGE HERE]

Route summary

2. Reviewed Marine Route fields 4
FieldReviewed Value
Origin access point and waterbody[Dock/shoreline point; canal / river / bay / lagoon / other]
Named destination and type[Name and boundary; ocean / gulf / protected bay / lagoon / estuary / other]
Analyzed distance[X.XX NM]
Estimated travel time at 10 kn[XX minutes]
Route reviewed[Date]
Onward ocean or gulf route[Separately reviewed / not reviewed / not applicable; endpoint and result]

Route description

[Describe the route to the named destination. Identify its endpoint and waterbody type. If it ends in a bay, lagoon or estuary, state whether the onward route through an inlet or pass to the ocean or gulf has also been reviewed. Report each leg separately.]

Material route observations

[Identify controlling or unusual route characteristics, alternate-route findings, and any conditions material to the determination.]

3. Vessel Compatibility

Vessel-to-Route Analysis

3. Vessel Compatibility fields 2
ConstraintVesselReviewed RouteMarginResult
Depth[Enter finding][Enter finding][Enter finding][Result / unverified]
Vertical clearance[Height + allowance][Enter finding][Enter finding][Result / unverified]
Width at required depth[Beam + side allowances][Usable width at same depth and water level][Enter finding][Result / unverified]
Length and turning room[Enter finding][Enter finding][Enter finding][Result / unverified]

Draft assessment

3. Vessel Compatibility fields 4
ItemValue
Vessel draft[X.X ft]
Controlling analyzed depth[X.X ft]
Calculated margin[+X.X ft]
Confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]

[Identify the least supported depth across the full required passage width, including approach and berth. Record datum, source date, assessed water level, required under-keel allowance and gaps in lateral survey coverage. A deep centerline or isolated sounding alone does not establish vessel compatibility.]

Vertical clearance assessment

3. Vessel Compatibility fields 7
ItemValue
Vessel height above water[XX.X ft]
Available vertical clearance[XX.X ft]
Calculated margin[+X.X ft]
Confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
Vertical clearance required[Vessel height + overhead allowance; ft]

[Record vessel height above the water in transit configuration, including antennas and equipment, plus the required overhead allowance. Compare with available clearance at the assessed water level and bridge opening state. Explain tide, datum and operating restrictions.]

Methodology caution: Present numeric margins only when the underlying measurements are genuinely comparable, including datum and operating-condition considerations.

Tidal access and usable passage width

Complete this assessment for each controlling segment and the property approach. A conditional finding must identify a supported operating window. If evidence cannot establish one, record unable to verify.

Water levels and combined access window

Tide station and local correction: [name / ID / distance / correction / source date]

Depth datum and clearance datum: [record separately; document conversion]

Assessed low water: [level / datum]; depth result [ ]; overhead result [ ]

Assessed high water: [level / datum]; depth result [ ]; overhead result [ ]

Minimum water level for depth and width: [ ]; maximum for overhead clearance: [ ]

Combined acceptable range: [lower to upper level / no overlap / unverified]

Transit and return window: [date / time zone / station correction / duration / bridge schedule]

Access finding: [compatible across assessed range / tide-dependent / not compatible / unable to verify]

High-tide access alone does not establish all-tide access. Confirm that the same passage window satisfies depth, width and overhead requirements for the entire transit and planned return. Predictions do not account for every weather-driven water-level change.

Width at the required depth

Vessel beam: [ ]; lateral allowance port [ ] and starboard [ ]; required width [ ]

Required depth: [loaded draft + under-keel allowance; operating basis]

Minimum supported width at that depth: [ ]; location and water level [ ]

Evidence: [survey / cross-section / bathymetric coverage / date / uncertainty]

Bends, bridge openings, berth and turning room: [findings and evidence]

Result: [compatible / conditional / not compatible / unable to verify]

For example, a narrow strip with adequate depth does not establish passage for a vessel with a 12 ft beam. Depth must be supported across the required usable corridor; shoreline-to-shoreline width and missing obstruction records are insufficient evidence.

4. Navigation Constraint Review

Bridges and Overhead Constraints

[Bridge / Structure Name]

4. Navigation Constraint Review fields 3
FieldValue
Type[Fixed / Movable / Other]
Published vertical clearance and datum[XX.X ft]
Vertical clearance required[XX.X ft]
Status[Compatible / Conditional / Incompatible / Insufficient Data]
Source[Source]
Data date[Date]
Water level and opening state[Level/datum; fixed / open / closed; operating restrictions]
Usable horizontal opening[Width at required depth and vertical clearance; evidence]

Reviewer observation: [Short explanation.]

Depth Constraints

4. Navigation Constraint Review fields 6
FieldValue
Controlling segment[Waterway/location description]
Depth across required passage width[X.X ft]
Vessel draft[X.X ft]
Confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
Required passage width[Beam + port/starboard allowances; ft and rationale]
Supported usable width[Width at required depth and assessed water level; source/date]
Lateral depth coverage[Survey footprint / cross-section reference / gaps]

Conditions affecting interpretation

[Record low-water and high-water findings, reference datum, tide station and local corrections. Higher water can improve depth while reducing overhead clearance. Document the overlapping water-level window that satisfies both constraints, together with currents, weather, shoaling, dredging and source limitations.]

Other identified constraints

4. Navigation Constraint Review fields 10
ConstraintFinding
Locks[None identified / details]
Dams[None identified / details]
Restricted passages[None identified / details]
Operational bridges[details]
Other material considerations[details]
5. Property Waterfront Access
[INSERT AERIAL / PROPERTY WATERFRONT MAP OR IMAGE HERE]
5. Property Waterfront Access fields 2
Review ItemFinding
Direct waterfront[Verified / Probable / Not established]
Dock identified[Yes / Probable / No / Unknown]
Waterfront access identified[Yes / No]
Connection to analyzed waterway[Verified / Probable / Unable to verify]
Access confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]

Reviewer assessment

Available property, imagery, shoreline and marine information was reviewed to evaluate the connection between the subject property and the analyzed marine route.

[Assess dock and approach width at the required depth, berth depth at assessed low water, turning room, shoreline relationship and intervening structures. Identify evidence of dock rights and restrictions separately from physical access. Unknown width or depth must remain unverified.]

Verification principle: Review property-to-water access, route to the named destination, and any onward ocean or gulf leg separately. A bay or lagoon endpoint is not proof of ocean access.

6. Verification & Confidence

Yacht.house Marine Access Verification

Yacht.house first analyzes the subject property using its marine-access analytics system. Marine Access Verification adds a manual review of the property-water interface, analyzed marine route, applicable depth information, overhead constraints, vessel dimensions, available source information, and identified areas of uncertainty.

Verification checklist

6. Verification & Confidence fields 4
ReviewStatusConfidence
Property location[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Waterfront relationship[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Property access point[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Route topology[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Route continuity[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Depth coverage[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Bridge/overhead constraints[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Vessel dimensions[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Vessel compatibility[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Material data gaps[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Depth across required width[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Tidal access window[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Vertical clearance at assessed water levels[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]
Destination type and onward route[Reviewed / pending][Assign / unknown]

* Vessel dimensions supplied by [customer / manufacturer / other source] unless otherwise stated.

Overall Verification Confidence

[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW / UNABLE TO VERIFY]

[Explain why this confidence level was assigned. Confidence definitions should be governed by the internal Yacht.house Marine Access Verification Standard rather than reviewer discretion alone.]

7. Sources, Conclusion & Limitations

Information reviewed

7. Sources, Conclusion & Limitations fields 2
InformationSource / Version
Property/listing information[Licensed source]
Hydrographic/bathymetric information[Source + dataset/version]
Bridge information[Source]
Marine charts[Source/version]
Imagery[Source/date where licensing permits]
Yacht.house marine analysis version[v1.x.x]
Manual verification standard[YH-MAVS v1.0]

Final determination

VERIFIED MARINE ACCESS [COMPATIBLE / CONDITIONAL / NOT COMPATIBLE / UNABLE TO VERIFY]

For the specified vessel, Yacht.house's reviewed analysis indicates [COMPATIBLE / CONDITIONAL / NOT COMPATIBLE / UNABLE TO VERIFY] access from [origin and waterbody] to [named destination and type]. This finding applies only to [assessed water-level range and operating conditions], with [required depth, passage width and vertical clearance]. Onward ocean or gulf access is [separately reviewed with result / not verified / not applicable]. State any unmet requirement or missing evidence explicitly.

7. Sources, Conclusion & Limitations fields 6
FieldValue
Property[Address]
Vessel[Description]
Overall confidence[HIGH / MODERATE / LOW]
Verification date[Date]
Report ID[ID]

Important limitations

This template is not a completed verification or navigation advice. A completed report must account for data currency, tides, weather, shoaling, dredging, temporary restrictions, bridge operations and vessel dimensions. Findings apply only to the reviewed vessel, route, conditions and evidence. Passage and future navigability are not guaranteed. Use current official navigation information and qualified operator judgment.

Read our sources and methodology and current coverage for the distinction between automated analysis and verified evidence.